Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.09 seconds)

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Golden Traders vs Special Secretary 1Had Considered The ... on 1 April, 2026

30. Even if it is held that the State officer of State B, is cross empowered to undertake such a function, various high courts have gone into the question of whether, such an officer is empowered to go into questions of value etc., and held to the contrary. The Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in Alfa Group Vs. The Assistant State Tax Officer, State Goods and Service Tax Department & Ors.2, the Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh in K.P. Sugandh Ltd. & Others Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & Ors, 3 the Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in Panchi Traders Vs. State of Gujarat 4 and the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad in shambhu Saran Agarwal & Company Vs. 5 Additional Commissioner Grade., had held that such power is not available to an officer under Section 129 or 130 of the GST Acts. 2 2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 142 3 2020 (38) GSTL 317 4 2025 (12) TMI 941 5 2024 (84) GSTL 181 (All.) 36 RRR,J& TCDS,J W.P.No.541 of 2026 & batch
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document
1