Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.75 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Gujarat vs Ramesh Chandra Mashruwala on 21 January, 1977

Rajkot Municipalm Corpn. vs Chanabhai Amrabhai Makwana on 25 July, 2005

13. The next question is with regard to the contention raised on behalf of the management relying upon the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in case of State of Gujarat v. Ramesh mopabhai Rathod, 2003 (3) GLR 2590 that for attracting and applicability of Section-25G and 25H of the I.D. Act, retrenchment covered by Section-25F is must, is required to be considered by this Court. Firstly, it is required to be noted that in the said case, the said controversy was not directly involved and on facts, it was found that there was no retrenchment by the employer at all and the Division Bench was considering the same and has made the passing observations which reads as under :
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 3 - M R Shah - Full Document

Hotchand Parmanand Motiramani vs State Of Gujarat And Ors. on 12 October, 1994

9. I am fortified in my view by the binding ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of State of Gujarat v. Ramesh Chandra, . On examination of the Scheme of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882, the Registrar of the Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad was held to be holding a Civil Judicial post and was, therefore, a member of the Judicial Service for the purposes of Article 235 of the Constitution of India. By analogy, the aforesaid binding ruling of the Supreme Court will hold the field in the present case.
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

A.R. Kukalekar vs Goa Housing Board And Anr. on 16 December, 1992

In the case of State of Gujarat and another v. Ramesh Chandra Mashruwala, , it is held that Articles 235 and 236 are irrelevant for the purpose of ascertaining the extent of disciplinary jurisdiction of the High Court. the Registrar of the Court of Small Causes is a person holding a civil judicial post inferior to the post of District Judge and is in Judicial Service. A reference to sections 9(i)(aa), 14, 33 to 36 of the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 indicates in no uncertain manner that the Registrar of a Small Causes Court exercises judicial powers, hears suits, passes decrees and an appeal is preferred from a decree of the Registrar. It follows that the High Court is competent to start disciplinary proceeding against the Registrar, Small Causes Court. The question of appointing authority is irrelevant in regard to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the High Court."
Bombay High Court Cites 103 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Mukesh Bansal S/O Shri V.P. Bansal, ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through The ... on 8 August, 2007

In this context, he has cited a catena of judgments to argue that refusal by the EO to supply the documents required by the applicant amounts to refusal of reasonable opportunity, vitiating the entire proceedings S.K. Jain v. Union of India ATR 1990 (2) C.A.T. 255; Kashinath Dikshita v. Union of India and Ors. ; State of Gujarat v. Ramesh Chandra Mashruwala 1997 AISLJ 198; Tirlok Nath v. Union of India and Ors. 1967 S.L.R (SC) 759; and State of Madhya Pradesh v. Chintaman Sadashiva Waishampayan AIR 1961 SC 1623.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1