Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.35 seconds)

Asheesh Kumar Sharma vs Rajesh Gupta on 14 August, 2013

He has placed reliance upon judgments of this Court in 'Goenka Tradelinks Pvt. Limited v. Indiabulls Financial Services Limited' (CRM M 34763 of 2012, decided on 22.05.2013), Apex Health Care Private Limited and others v. M/s Alchemist Hospitals Limited, 2012(5) R.C.R. (Criminal) 694 and 'M/s Bharat Trading Company and others v. State of CRM M 14752 of 2009 4 Haryana and another', 2012(2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 154, wherein, the question of conducting an inquiry in proceedings under Section 138 of the 1881 Act, has been dealt in detail and held that the provisions of Section 202 of the Code have no applicability to a complaint under Section 138 of the 1881 Act, as the offence is non-cognizable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - R Mittal - Full Document

Alka Jain vs M/S Bibby Financial Services India ... on 20 September, 2013

This question in regard to conducting of enquiry envisaged under Section 202 of the Code in case under Section 138 of the Act was dealt in Goenka Tradelinks Private Limited vs. Indiabulls Financial Services Limited (CRM No. 34763 of 2012, decided on 22.5.2013) and Apex Health Care Private Limited and others vs. M/s Alchemist Hospitals Limited, 2012 (5) RCR (Criminal) 964, wherein after reference to the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in K.Bhaskaran vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and another 1999(7) SCC 510 and Harman Electronics Private Limited and another vs. National Panasonic India Private Limited, (2009) 1 SCC 720 has been held as quoted hereinbelow:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Mittal - Full Document
1