Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.38 seconds)

Geri Bibi vs Sarasamed Meer Saheb And Ors. on 30 April, 1928

That this idea of a charity school is not new can be seen from Ex. D which is a copy of the inam statement of 1863 where the Vakil for Jaina Bibi says that the firman is for "feeding fakirs and for maintaining a charity school" However, it seems to me that we now have a correct translation in Jagga Row Bahadur v. Gori Bibi 72 Ind. Cas. 789 : 17 L.W. 521 : (1923) M.W.N. 47 A.I.R. 1923 Mad. 545 and as Mr. Hameed Hassan himself says the object of the chartiy is as I have said.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gori Bibi vs Sarasamed Meer Saheb And Ors. on 30 April, 1928

7. He says that a charity school does not certainly appear there, but that the charity should be devoted to the assistance of students among others. It ought to be mentioned that by the endorsement on the firman the original holder, Hajee Mahomed Sadak Saheb was empowered to maintain himself from the inam village which was appropriated to the durga by this firman. Abdul Gaffar says in the evidence he has now given before the second District Judge that no charity school was ever maintained and that the word " talab " really means maintenance of servants whereas the Persian translator says it means maintenance of students. That this idea of a charity school is not new can be seen from Ex. D which is a copy of the inam statement of 1863 where the vakil for Jaina Bibi says that the firman 'is for '' feeding fakirs and for maintaining a charity school." However it seems to me that we now have a correct translation in Jagga Rao Bahadur v. Gori Bibi and as Mr. Hameed Hassan himself says the object of the charity is as I have said.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1