Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.64 seconds)
Documents citing D. Manga @ Mangamma vs D. Venkata Ramana on 9 September, 1999

Sunil Sehgal vs Chhaya Sehgal on 22 July, 2003

7. False complaints to police, High Court or other persons, authorities like superior officers of the petitioner may amount to cruelty. D. Manga @ Mangamma v. D. Venkata Ramana, I (2002) DMC 663=2000 MLR 274; M.K. Malhotra v. Smt. Kirti Malhotra, 1987 MLR 268 (in this case false complaints were to Prime Minister and his office. Reminders were also sent. On inquiry allegations were found baseless).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K. Radha Raju vs K. Seetharama Raju on 7 September, 2001

15. On the other hand, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-husband relied upon several judgments of this Court viz., S. Vijaya Laskhmi v. S. Bheem Reddy, ; Lokeshwari v. Srinivasa Rao, ; D. Manga v. D. Venkata Ramana, ; Jaya Krishna Panigrahi v. Surekha Panigrahi, 1995 (3) ALT 195; Chiranjeevi v. Lavanya, ; and Anagalla Padmalatha v. A. Sudershan Rao, AIR 2000 AP 353; and submitted that in the light of the principles laid down in the said decisions the conduct of the wife amounts to cruelty, and therefore, the decree granted by the Court below dissolving the marriage is justified.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 23 - Cited by 13 - G Rohini - Full Document
1