Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (4.50 seconds)
Documents citing Kamaksha Rai & Ors vs State Of U.P on 1 October, 1999

State vs . Nitin Dubey And Ors on 23 September, 2019

In Kamaksha Rai & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1999) 8 SCC 701, The Hon'ble Supreme Court observed "Taking into consideration the nature of attack and the possibility or otherwise of the identification of these accused persons by the prosecution witnesses and bearing in mind the principles laid down by this Court in the above­ cited judgments, we are of the opinion that it is not safe to rely on the evidence of witnesses who speak generally and in an omnibus way without specific reference to the identity of the individuals and their specific overt acts in regard to the incident ..."
Delhi District Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gangadhar Behera And Ors vs State Of Orissa on 10 October, 2002

Above being the position, we find no substance in the plea that evidence of eye witnesses is not sufficient to fasten guilt by application of Section 149. So far as the observations made in Kamaksha Rai's case (supra), it is to be noted that the decision in the said case was rendered in a different factual scenario altogether. There is always peril in treating the words of a judgment as though they are words in a legislative enactment, and it is to be remembered that judicial utterances are made in the setting of the facts of a particular case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 430 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next