Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing Manish Kumar Mishra vs Union Of India And 4 Ors. on 1 May, 2020

M/S Ramom Motion Auto Corp. Pvt. Ltd. ... vs Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal ... on 13 June, 2022

11. Replying to the aforesaid objection, Sri Sudeep Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the petitioners' had taken a loan from the respondent no. 3 Bank situated at Lucknow, for recovery of the aforesaid amount, the Additional District Magistrate (Administration), Lucknow passed an order on 28.03.2022 for taking possession of the petitioners' property situated at Lucknow, in an appeal filed by the petitioners the DRT sitting at Lucknow had passed an interim order on 28-04-2022 and the same has been vacated on 02-05-2022 at Lucknow, which is the cause of action for approaching this Court. He has submitted that judgment in the case of Manish Kumar Mishra (supra) helps the petitioners.
Allahabad High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Bharat Nidhi Limited vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India & ... on 18 December, 2023

―148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a ―cause of action‖ so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of 21 2020 SCC OnLine All 535 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Digitally Signed CHOPRA Signing Date:18.12.2023 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:16:53 KUMAR KAURAV
Delhi High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Matrix Merchandise Limited & Ors. vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India & ... on 18 December, 2023

―148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a ―cause of action‖ so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of 21 2020 SCC OnLine All 535 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Digitally Signed CHOPRA Signing Date:18.12.2023 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:16:53 KUMAR KAURAV
Delhi High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Pune Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Bank Of India on 19 December, 2023

"148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a "cause of action" so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of invoking the Court's territorial jurisdiction, in the context of clause (2) of Article 226."
Delhi High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Majestic Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Through ... vs Punjab National Bank & Anr. on 19 December, 2023

"148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a "cause of action" so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of invoking the Court's territorial jurisdiction, in the context of clause (2) of Article 226."
Delhi High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Shri Siddhi Vinayak Medical College And ... vs Union Of India & Anr. on 8 October, 2024

"148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a 17 (2004) 6 SCC 254 18 2020 SCC OnLine All 535 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Digitally Signed By:MAANAS JAJORIA Signing Date:15.10.2024 By:PURUSHAINDRA 11:18:20 KUMAR KAURAV -17- "cause of action" so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of invoking the Court's territorial jurisdiction, in the context of clause (2) of Article
Delhi High Court Cites 56 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document

Ashoka Marketing Limited & Anr. vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India & ... on 18 December, 2023

―148. In order to confer jurisdiction on the High Court to entertain a writ petition, the Court must be satisfied from the entire facts pleaded in support of the cause of action that those facts constitute a cause so as to empower the Court to decide a dispute which has, at least in part, arisen within its jurisdiction. Each and every fact pleaded in the application may not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that those facts give rise to a cause of action within the Court's territorial jurisdiction unless those facts are such which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in the case. Facts, which have no bearing with the lis or the dispute involved in the case would not give rise to a ―cause of action‖ so as to confer territorial jurisdiction on the Court concerned, and only those facts which give rise to a cause of action within a Court's territorial jurisdiction which have a nexus or relevance with the lis that is involved in that case, would be relevant for the purpose of 21 2020 SCC OnLine All 535 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Digitally Signed CHOPRA Signing Date:18.12.2023 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:16:53 KUMAR KAURAV
Delhi High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - P K Kaurav - Full Document
1   2 3 Next