Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.61 seconds)
Documents citing Indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 21 May, 2007

K.G. Denim Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise on 8 October, 2007

In the case of Indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad 2007 (213) E.L.T. 20 (Tri.-LB), a Larger Bench of this Tribunal took note of the non obstante clause in Sub-section (2) of Section 4A reading "Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 4" and held that the provisions of Section 4A were overriding in nature vis-a-vis those of Section 4.
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Tamil Nadu Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raymond Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... on 2 January, 2014

In the case of Indica Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad [2007 (213) E.L.T. 20 (Tri.-LB)], a Larger Bench of this Tribunal took note of the non obstante clause in sub-section (2) of Section 4A reading Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 4 and held that the provisions of Section 4A were overriding in nature vis-a-vis those of Section 4.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 29 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd on 7 July, 2009

2. We have heard both sides. We find that the issue stands settled in favour of the assessees by the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in IPCA Laboratories Vs CCE Indore, 2004 (170) ELT 40 (Tri.-LB) holding that a manufacturer of drugs can price his goods at any price below the maximum retail price specified in the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yes vs Represented By : Shri B.K. Juneja, Jt. ... on 2 September, 2009

IPCA Laborattories vs. CCE, Indore  2004 (170) ELT 40 (Tri.- LB) and CCE Pondicherry vs. Spic Pharmaceuticals Division  2005 (181) ELT 284 (Tri.- Chennai). The decision in the case of Spic stands confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court when, after condoning the delay in filing the appeal by Commissioner (Appeals), the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that -- we see no reasons to interfere. The said decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2005 (187 ELT A152 (Supreme Court).
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1