Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 72 (1.39 seconds)
Documents citing Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh ... vs M/S Ajay Sales And Suppliers on 9 September, 2021

M/S Radhika Engineering Co. vs Telecommunication Consultants India ... on 28 May, 2024

This view was overruled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and while relying upon Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Limited v. Ajay Sales & Suppliers, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 730 and TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 377, it was held that not applying Section 12(5) of the Arbitration (Amendment) Act, 2015 is unjust and against principles of natural justice.
Delhi High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - P M Singh - Full Document

Richpal Singh vs ) Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital on 10 January, 2023

22.Lately, in case title Jaipur Jila Dugdh Utpadak Sehkari Sangh Ltd. Vs. Ajay Sales and Suppliers, 2021 SCC Online SC 730, the Supreme Court Bench headed by HMJ M R Shah dealt with a case where the Arbitration Clause dated 31.03.2015 provided for appointment of Sangh's Chairman as Sole Arbitrator. When the dispute arose and Arbitration was invoked on 19.10.2019, the respondent approached High Court of Rajasthan which under Section 11 of The Act where a fresh Arbitrator was appointed.
Delhi District Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhawar Singh And Anr vs M/S Shree Ank Finhold Pvt Ltd on 23 September, 2023

35. Lately, in case title Jaipur Jila Dugdh Utpadak Sehkari Sangh Ltd. Vs. Ajay Sales and Suppliers, 2021 SCC Online SC 730, the Supreme Court Bench headed by HMJ M R Shah dealt with a case where the Arbitration Clause dated OMP (Comm.) No.10/2022 Page 20 of 39 Bhawar Singh and Anr. Vs. M/s Shree ANK 31.03.2015 provided for appointment of Sangh's Chairman as Sole Arbitrator. When the dispute arose and Arbitration was invoked on 19.10.2019, the respondent approached High Court of Rajasthan which under Section 11 of The Act where a fresh Arbitrator was appointed.
Delhi District Court Cites 73 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushila Devi vs Capri Global Capital Limited on 2 September, 2023

(20) In case titled Jaipur Jila Dugdh Utpadak Sehkari Sangh Ltd. Vs. Ajay Sales and Suppliers, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 730, the Supreme Court Bench headed by HMJ M R Shah dealt with a case where the Arbitration Clause dated 31.03.2015 provided for appointment of Sangh's Chairman as Sole Arbitrator. When the dispute arose and Arbitration was invoked on 19.10.2019, the respondent approached High Court of Rajasthan which under Section 11 of the Act where a fresh Arbitrator was appointed. When the High Court's order was challenged before the Supreme Court with a plea that the Arbitration Clause pre­existed the 2015 Amendment of The Act and inclusion of Section 12(5) and Schedule 7, Hon'ble Apex Court while dismissing the petition challenging the High Court order observed as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Isar Engineers Private Ltd. vs Ntpc-Sail Power Company Ltd. on 3 February, 2025

In view of the above and for the reasons stated hereinabove, the impugned judgment and order [Ellora Paper Mills Ltd. v. State of M.P., 2021 SCC OnLine MP 2796] passed by the High Court is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in TRF [TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engg. Projects Ltd., (2017) 8 SCC 377 : (2017) 4 SCC (Civ) 72] , Bharat Broadband Network [Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd., (2019) 5 SCC 755 : (2019) 3 SCC (Civ) 1] and the recent decision of this Court in Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh [Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. v. Ajay Sales & Suppliers, (2021) 17 SCC 248 :
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Vadera Interiors And Exteriors vs Apex Buildsys Ltd. on 19 March, 2025

After referring to the decision of this Court in Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. [Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd., (2019) 5 SCC 755 : (2019) 3 SCC (Civ) 1] , it is observed and held in para 18 as under : (Ajay Sales & Suppliers case [Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. v. Ajay Sales & Suppliers, (2021) 17 SCC 248 : 2021 SCC OnLine SC 730] ) "18. Now so far as the submission on behalf of the petitioners that the respondents participated in the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 107/2024 Page 10 of 20 By:RAHUL SINGH Signing Date:20.03.2025 19:20:38 arbitration proceedings before the sole arbitrator
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S Prasad - Full Document

Shakti Pump India Ltd vs Apex Buildsys Ltd on 19 March, 2025

After referring to the decision of this Court in Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. [Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd., (2019) 5 SCC 755 : (2019) 3 SCC (Civ) 1] , it is observed and held in para 18 as under : (Ajay Sales & Suppliers case [Jaipur Zila Dugdh Utpadak Sahkari Sangh Ltd. v. Ajay Sales & Suppliers, (2021) 17 SCC 248 : 2021 SCC OnLine SC 730] ) "18. Now so far as the submission on behalf of the petitioners that the respondents participated in the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 107/2024 Page 10 of 20 By:RAHUL SINGH Signing Date:20.03.2025 19:20:38 arbitration proceedings before the sole arbitrator
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - S Prasad - Full Document

Kasim Chaudhary @ Kasim Ali vs M/S Shriram Transport Finance Company ... on 13 October, 2023

(21) In case titled Jaipur Jila Dugdh Utpadak Sehkari Sangh Ltd. Vs. Ajay Sales and Suppliers, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 730, the Supreme Court Bench headed by HMJ M R Shah dealt with a case where the Arbitration Clause dated 31.03.2015 provided for appointment of Sangh's Chairman as Sole Arbitrator. When the dispute arose and Arbitration was invoked on 19.10.2019, the respondent approached High Court of Rajasthan which under Section 11 of the Act where a fresh Arbitrator was appointed. When the High Court's order was Kasim Chaudhary Vs. M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. OMP (COMM) No. 44/2023, Judgment dated: 13.10.2023 Page No. 22 of 38 challenged before the Supreme Court with a plea that the Arbitration Clause pre­existed the 2015 Amendment of The Act and inclusion of Section 12(5) and Schedule 7, Hon'ble Apex Court while dismissing the petition challenging the High Court order observed as under:
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next