Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.01 seconds)

United Bank Of India Ltd. vs Lekharam Sonaram & Co. And Ors. on 12 March, 1958

Upon these facts it was held that this document required registration. The learned Judge relied upon the Privy Council ruling reported in Subramanian v. Lutchman, ILR 50 Cal 338: (AIR 1023 PC 50) (J), and he felt bound to follow this authority though his attention was invited to another ruling of the Madras High Court reported in Muthiah Chetty v. Kothandaramaswami Naidu, 35 Ind Cas 864: (AIR 1917 Mad 799) (J1) which was somewhat in conflict with this Privy Council decision.
Patna High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

A.R.A.R.S.M. Arunachallam Chetty vs C. Jagannatha Pillai on 18 August, 1926

I was referred to a decision in Muthiah Chetty v. Kothandaramaswami Chetty [1916] 31 M.L.J. 347 but that seems to me to be somewhat in conflict with the Calcutta decision and as this decision was a decision prior to the decision in the Calcutta case and moreover as the Calcutta case is a decision of the Privy Council I am bound by that, I need not follow this decision.
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1