Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Pacific Development Corpn Ltd vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation And Anr on 17 September, 2021

Asad Mueed & Anr. vs Hammad Ahmed & Ors. on 14 February, 2023

The amended Section 17 is an embodiment of the legislative intent to arm the Tribunal with powers similar and akin to those conferred upon a court. This aspect also stands duly highlighted in the decision of the Supreme Court in Arcelor Mittal noticed above. The provision as it now stands thus enables the Tribunal to frame injunctions and orders of protection in terms identical to those conferred upon a court exercising powers under Section 9. These aspects were also noticed by this Court in a recent decision rendered in Pacific Development Corporation vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.11 as would be evident from the following extracts of that decision: -
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document

Hindustan Construction Company ... vs Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited on 15 February, 2023

5. Mr. Johri, learned counsel appearing for the DMRC, on the other hand, has sought to draw sustenance from the judgment rendered Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEHA Signing Date:16.02.2023 17:07:22 by the Court in Pacific Development Corporation Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. [2023 SCC OnLine Del 521] and contends that the nomination made by the petitioner unilaterally cannot be countenanced in law since at that time it could not be said that the respondent had failed to act in terms of the appointment procedure as prescribed. It was submitted that the matter can be duly resolved in light of the procedure which was formulated by the Court in Pacific Development.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Y Varma - Full Document
1