Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.88 seconds)
Documents citing Lala Ram Asre Singh And Ors. vs Ambica Lal And Ors. on 24 January, 1929

P.Priya vs The Dharmapuri Coop Town Bank Ltd on 23 April, 2019

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Madras High Court Cites 91 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

S.Alim Basha vs Deputy Registrar/Managing Director on 4 July, 2019

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Madras High Court Cites 89 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

P.Lalitha vs Deputy Registrar/Managing Director on 4 July, 2019

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Madras High Court Cites 89 - Cited by 0 - S M Subramaniam - Full Document

S.Menaka vs K.S.K.Nepolian Socraties on 21 March, 2024

Following the decision in Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh [AIR 1927 Pat 219] that a widow by selling properties subject to usufructuary mortgage cannot jeopardise the right of the reversioners to redeem, it was held that the sale would not be binding on them but a different view was taken in Lala Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal [AIR 1929 Pat 216] that a widow was not debarred from selling properties subject to mortgage where there was necessity for it merely by reason of the fact that they were subject to usufructuary mortgage which contained no personal covenant to pay. But the learned Judge hearing Second Appeals declined to follow this decision and by stating the reasons held that the sale deed in favour of the appellant was not binding on the reversioners. Thereafter the appellant applied before the High Court under Article 133 for leave to appeal to this court.
Madras High Court Cites 82 - Cited by 0 - M Sundar - Full Document

M/S Geo Miller And Co Pvt Ltd vs Up Jal Nigam And 2 Others on 17 May, 2024

"10. Law will be bereft of all its utility if it should be thrown into a state of uncertainty by reason of conflicting decisions, and it is therefore desirable that in case of difference of opinion, the question should be authoritatively settled. It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Allahabad High Court Cites 37 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mohmood Hussain vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 July, 2023

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the ____________ Page 59 of 87 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.20553 of 2023 etc., batch Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Madras High Court Cites 99 - Cited by 0 - D B Chakravarthy - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iv, Pune vs Dr. Kasliwal Medical Care And Research ... on 21 October, 2024

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [ Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Bombay High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 0 - G S Kulkarni - Full Document

Moktar Hussain vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 19 March, 2025

It sometimes happens that an earlier decision [Dasrath Singh v. Damri Singh, 1925 SCC OnLine Pat 242 : AIR 1927 Pat 219] given by a Bench is not brought to the notice of a Bench [Ram Asre Singh v. Ambica Lal, AIR 1929 Pat 216] hearing the same question, and a contrary decision is given without Page No.# 23/26 reference to the earlier decision. The question has also been discussed as to the correct procedure to be followed when two such conflicting decisions are placed before a later Bench. The practice in the Patna High Court appears to be that in those cases, the earlier decision is followed and not the later.
Gauhati High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next