Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 710 (1.00 seconds)
Documents citing Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. Ltd vs Empkoyees Of Hindustan Tin Works Pvt. ... on 7 September, 1978

U.P. Road Transport Corp. Upsrtc Thru. ... vs The Prescribed Authority Labour Court ... on 15 November, 2025

Such a view is no doubt debatable, having regard to the ratio decidendi in Hindustan Tin Works [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80] , Surendra Kumar Verma [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Labour Commr., (1980) 4 SCC 443] and Deepali Gundu Surwase [Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, (2013) 10 SCC 324] .
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

P.Srinivas vs Apsrtc Rep By Its M. D on 22 November, 2025

Such a view is no doubt debatable, having regard to the ratio decidendi in Hindustan Tin Works [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 53] , Surendra Kumar Verma [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Labour Commr., (1980) 4 SCC 443 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 16] and Deepali Gundu Surwase [Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya, (2013) 10 SCC 324 : (2014) 2 SCC (L&S) 184] .
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Thomson Reuters India Private Limited vs Ld Presiding Officer, Labour Court & Anr on 30 September, 2021

38.7. The observation made in J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal [(2007) 2 SCC 433 : (2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 651] that on reinstatement the employee/workman cannot claim continuity of service as of right is contrary to the ratio of the judgments of three-Judge Benches [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 53] , [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal- cum-Labour Court, (1980) 4 SCC 443 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 16] referred to hereinabove and cannot be treated as good law. This part of the judgment is also against the very concept of reinstatement of an employee/workman."
Delhi High Court Cites 123 - Cited by 50 - J Singh - Full Document

Delhi Transport Corporation vs Gulab Singh on 24 November, 2015

Lack of infrastructure and manpower is the principal cause for delay in the disposal of cases. For this the litigants cannot be blamed or penalised. It would amount to grave injustice to an employee or workman if he is denied back wages simply because there is long lapse of time between the termination of his service and finality given to the order of reinstatement. The Courts should bear in mind that in most of these cases, the employer is in an advantageous position vis-à-vis the employee or workman. He can avail the services of best legal brain for prolonging the agony of the sufferer, i.e., the employee or workman, who can ill afford the luxury of spending money on a lawyer with certain amount of fame. Therefore, in such cases it would be prudent to adopt the course suggested in Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited v. Employees of Hindustan Tin Works Private Limited (supra).
Delhi High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - S Gupta - Full Document

B. S. Rawat vs Delhi Technological University on 15 December, 2021

The observation made in J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal [(2007) 2 SCC 433 : (2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 651] that on reinstatement the employee/workman cannot claim W.P. (C) 2611/2019 Page 40 of 41 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR Signing Date:20.12.2021 15:24:09 continuity of service as of right is contrary to the ratio of the judgments of three-Judge Benches [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 53] , [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, (1980) 4 SCC 443 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 16] referred to hereinabove and cannot be treated as good law. This part of the judgment is also against the very concept of reinstatement of an employee/workman."
Delhi High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 2 - J Singh - Full Document

Afr Madhusmita Dutta vs State Of Orissa & Others ....... Opp. ... on 9 May, 2024

38.7. The observation made in J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal [J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. K.P. Agrawal, (2007) 2 SCC Page 11 of 15 433 : (2007) 1 SCC (L&S) 651] that on reinstatement the employee/workman cannot claim continuity of service as of right is contrary to the ratio of the judgments of three-Judge Benches [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 53] , [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, (1980) 4 SCC 443 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 16] referred to hereinabove and cannot be treated as good law. This part of the judgment is also against the very concept of reinstatement of an employee/workman.
Orissa High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S Mishra - Full Document

Bholanath Lal vs M/S. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd. on 10 May, 2018

Judge Benches [Hindustan Tin Works (P) Ltd. v. Employees, (1979) 2 SCC 80 : 1979 SCC (L&S) 53] , [Surendra Kumar Verma v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, (1980) 4 SCC 443 : 1981 SCC (L&S) 16] referred to hereinabove and cannot be treated as good law. This part of the judgment WP (C) 601, 605 & 606/2014 Page 14 of 19 is also against the very concept of reinstatement of an employee/workman."
Delhi High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 2 - V Goel - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next