Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.33 seconds)

Satyendra Kumar Verma vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 January, 2021

25. A close look of the above decision of Hon'ble Apex Court would also indicate that no opinion has been expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court with respect to the fact as to whether in a case wherein the Anticipatory Bail Application has been allowed to an accused for a limited period i.e. till submission of police report under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. and subsequently charge-sheet is submitted, whether another application for the Anticipatory Bail would be permissible or not by the same accused, therefore, this point needs clarification particularly in view of the conflicting judgement of Patna High Court in Bishundeo Sahu's case (Supra) which is in conflict with the judgement of this Court passed by Single Bench of this Court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mahendra Mehta vs The State Of Bihar on 25 April, 2019

In view of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Bishundeo Sahu v. The State of Bihar & Ors., 2011(1)PLJR 731 and in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. The State of Bihar, 2004(3) PLJR 491, once an accused is on police bail during the course of investigation even after submission of chargesheet, the anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Such accused shall be deemed to be on police bail even after submission of chargesheet till it is cancelled in accordance with law.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - P K Jha - Full Document

Pratima Kumari @ Pratima Devi vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 1 May, 2019

Hence, the second anticipatory bail application had been preferred by opposite party no. 2, vide Cr. Misc. No. 32991 of 2018 by which he was granted anticipatory bail on 18.06.2018. The aforesaid second anticipatory bail application i.e., Cr. Misc. No. 32991 of 2018 was not maintainable in light of the judgment referred by a Division Bench of this Court reported in 2011(1)PLJR 731: (Bishundeo Sahu Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors).
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document

Osi Akhatar @ Bablu vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 18 January, 2018

In the aforesaid given facts, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application in connection with Complaint Case No. 1096 of 2017, Trial No. 3518 of 2017, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Gopalganj, in light of the judgment rendered in the case of (Bishundeo Sahu & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.,) reported in 2011(1) PLJR 731.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Singh - Full Document
1   2 Next