V.Selvarani (Died) vs V.Selvarani
17.In so far as the disinheritance of the other heirs of the
Sowdammal, the learned counsel would submit, the daughters have gone out
of the family after marriage and the plaintiff in O.S.No.307 of 2004, who is
the other son was not taking care of the mother, and it was the 2 nd defendant
who was looking after her. This impelled the mother to execute a will in
favour of her daughter-in-law/wife of the 2nd defendant. The learned
18/34
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.Nos.481, 482, 516 & 517 of 2013
counsel would also rely upon the judgment in Valsa Jose Vs.
V.B.Chandran and Others reported in 2019 (5) CTC 625 authored by one
of us (R.Subramanian. J) to contend that there is no pleading that the
ostensible owner namely, 9th defendant stood in a fiduciary capacity to the
plaintifff or Ramasamy Chettiar and as such the property was purchsed in
her name could be treated as joint family property.