Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 112 (1.26 seconds)
Documents citing Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 10 April, 1989

State vs . Anshuman Narang & Ors on 30 April, 2021

68. Perusal of the above-said portion of testimony of the complainant would reveal that the allegations levelled are vague, general and omnibus allegations and fails to pass muster the test laid down by Hon'ble superior courts in the matter of Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors, Richhpal Kaur Vs State of Haryana and Anr, State of HP V Nikkur Ram and Ors (Supra). Further, Complainant Ritika testified that on 23.10.2014, on the occasion of festival of Diwali, her father-in-law gifted her a Gold and Polki necklace. It is baffling that if the accused persons wanted to divorce the complainant why they gifted her such an expensive gift.
Delhi District Court Cites 55 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar Khanna vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) And Ors. on 15 October, 2001

In this regard we are supported by the decision of Bombay High Court in Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare v. State of Maharashtra (1990) Crl.L.J. Page 47 (Bombay) and Rajanimal and Ors. v. State by D.S.P. CB CID 1993 Cr.L.J. Page 3019. Court observed that cruelty by itself without demand would not be sufficient to bring home the guilt under explanation (b) of Section 498A IPC. Harassment by itself is not a cruelty unless there is a demand of dowry and the cruelty is a consequence of that demand.
Delhi High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 73 - M A Khan - Full Document

State vs Chanchal Chakraborty on 18 December, 2018

Similar   view   was   adopted   in   the   decision   reported   as  Smt. Sarla   Prabhakar   Waghmare  Vs.  State   of   Maharashtra  & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty FIR No. 191/2008; PS Kalkaji           State  Vs.  Chanchal Chakraborty                     69 of  70 that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No. 490/2004;Ps Kalkaji State vs . Pawan Kumar & Ors. 1 Of 26 on 21 December, 2018

(vi)  Similar view was adopted in the decision reported as Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare  Vs.  State of Maharashtra  & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A   IPC.   Beating   and   harassment   must   be   to   force   the   bride   to commit   suicide   or   to   fulfill   illegal   demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No. 83/2008; Ps Oia State vs . Imran Khan & Ors. 1 Of 46 on 18 December, 2018

(x)     Similar   view   was   adopted   in   the   decision   reported   as  Smt.   Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No. 341/2014 State vs . Sonu Pathak & Anr. Ps Oia 1 Of 12 on 11 January, 2019

(vii) Similar view was adopted in the decision reported as Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Reliance Is Placed Upon Decision In ... vs . State & Ors. on 16 January, 2019

(vii) Similar view was adopted in the decision reported as Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, State v. Irshad; PS H.N. Din FIR No.69/2013 10/12 wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No. 103/15;Ps G.K.­I State vs . Ajay Dass & Ors. Page 1 Of 14 on 24 January, 2019

(vii) Similar view was adopted in the decision reported as Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fir No.25/2012; Ps Oia State vs . Mahipal & Ors. 1 Of 25 on 15 May, 2019

17. Similar view was adopted in the decision reported as Smt. Sarla Prabhakar Waghmare Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 1990 (2) RCR 18, wherein Hon'ble Bombay High Court observed that it is not every harassment or every type of cruelty that would attract Section 498­A IPC. Beating and harassment must be to force the bride to commit suicide or to fulfill illegal demands.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next