Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.49 seconds)
Documents citing Larsen & Tourbo Ltd & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 14 September, 2010

Brij Mohan And 36 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru Special Secy. And 6 ... on 7 March, 2017

In M/s. Larsen and Tourbo Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.16, a specific submission was made on behalf of the State that Section 48 of the Act does not provide for publication of a notification regarding the withdrawal of the acquisition proceedings unlike Sections 4 and 6 of the Act which require such a publication. The Supreme Court, however, repelled the contention and observed :
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 2 - D Gupta - Full Document

Himmatlal vs State on 19 October, 2010

7. That the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.1151 of 2009 had an occasion to consider the question of possession viz-a-vis the Repeal Act, 1999 and having noticed a reported decision of the Apex Court in the case of Larsen & Tourbo Ltd. v. State of Gujarat and others reported in (1998) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 387 and further the subsidiary question as to whether after the possession was once taken over, if the appellant petitioner re-entered the land, that by itself would be sufficient to ensure lapsing of the proceedings under the Repeal Act. In para 12 of the above decision, the Division Bench referred to a case decided earlier and section 3 of the Repeal Act, 1999, held as under:
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - S J Mukhopadhaya - Full Document
1