Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.88 seconds)

Sh. Rohit Bhatnagar vs Sh. Sanjeev Arora on 17 September, 2022

Further, if the petitioner owns a space himself, he cannot be forced to use a rented space for his business requirements while the tenant enjoys the suit property. The petitioner cannot be expected to pay rent for running a business to earn livelihood when he has a space available with him and suitable for running the same business. On this subject, reference can be have to decision given in the case of "Kailash Chand Vs. Chand, 1998 RLR 603" wherein it was held that if an owner is living in the tenanted premises, he is entitle to seek eviction of his tenant and this desire cannot be held to be imaginary, fanciful or unnatural.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Rohit Bhatnagar vs Sh. M. L. Arora on 17 September, 2022

Further, if the petitioner owns a space himself, he cannot be forced to use a rented space for his business requirements while the tenant enjoys the suit property. The petitioner cannot be expected to pay rent for running a business to earn livelihood when he has a space available with him and suitable for running the same business. On this subject, reference can be have to decision given in the case of "Kailash Chand Vs. Chand, 1998 RLR 603" wherein it was held that if an owner is living in the tenanted premises, he is entitle to seek eviction of his tenant and this desire cannot be held to be imaginary, fanciful or unnatural.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1