Further, if the petitioner owns a space himself, he cannot be forced to
use a rented space for his business requirements while the tenant enjoys the suit
property. The petitioner cannot be expected to pay rent for running a business to earn
livelihood when he has a space available with him and suitable for running the same
business. On this subject, reference can be have to decision given in the case of
"Kailash Chand Vs. Chand, 1998 RLR 603" wherein it was held that if an owner is
living in the tenanted premises, he is entitle to seek eviction of his tenant and this
desire cannot be held to be imaginary, fanciful or unnatural.
Further, if the petitioner owns a space himself, he cannot be forced to
use a rented space for his business requirements while the tenant enjoys the
suit property. The petitioner cannot be expected to pay rent for running a
business to earn livelihood when he has a space available with him and
suitable for running the same business. On this subject, reference can be
have to decision given in the case of "Kailash Chand Vs. Chand, 1998
RLR 603" wherein it was held that if an owner is living in the tenanted
premises, he is entitle to seek eviction of his tenant and this desire cannot
be held to be imaginary, fanciful or unnatural.