Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (3.29 seconds)
Documents citing Sub-Major, J. S. Randhawa vs Union Of India And Others on 12 July, 2000

Shambhu Prasad Nawani And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 17 November, 2005

In this respect, the learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sub Major J.S. Randhawa v. Union of India and Ors. reported as 2000(5) SLR 387 which held that no requisite percentage of mark have been laid down for the interview in ITBP (Indo Tibetan Board Police) i.e. respondent No. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Director General of ITBP had observed that failing in interview has no meaning at all because passing of the interview has now been done away in the all India Services examinations. It is also submitted that the Special Leave Petition filed against the above judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petitioners were entitled to succeed. The case of the petitioners is that after taking into consideration the overall secured marks by the petitioners, they were was entitled to be promoted & an insistence upon minimum 40% marks in the interview was uncalled for & unsustainable. The learned counsel for the respondent has relied upon the standing order dated 24th November, 1999 being the standing order No. 8/99/1999, which according to him was relevant and applicable in the present case. This standing order provided as follows:-
Delhi High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M Mudgal - Full Document
1