Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.45 seconds)

Rajeev Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 20 July, 2023

This Court has gone through the facts of the case, the averment made as also the document on record and is convinced that before the petitioner was sent the letters in question, he was not put on show cause and on the sole ground as also in view of the orders passed in Uma Associates (supra) all the letters in question relating to the two writ petitions have to go which are accordingly quashed.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document

Kumar Harsh vs The State Of Bihar on 20 July, 2023

3. Both the learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned Special PP Mines jointly submitted that this case is also covered by order of co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Uma Associates Vs The State of Bihar & Others passed in CWJC No. 3400 of 2023 and the relevant paragraphs Patna High Court CWJC No.6156 of 2023(3) dt.20-07-2023 4/5 no. 7 to 9 which are incorporated herein below:-
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Roy - Full Document

M And T Enterprises vs The State Of Bihar on 8 September, 2023

13. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the settled position of law, this Court also feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitions in terms of the orders passed by the learned coordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of M/S Harsh Construction (supra) and Uma Associates (supra) and accordingly in consequence thereof, the orders under challenge passed by the concerned respondent- Mines Development Officer, Kishanganj and duly affirmed by the District Collector-Kishanganj are hereby quashed and cancelled. The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Mining Corporation Limited, Patna is directed to refund the respective amount realised from the petitioners, if any, and also to ensure refund of the respective security of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not refunded till date.
Patna High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Kumar - Full Document

Jai Shiv Shakti Enterprises vs The State Of Bihar on 8 September, 2023

13. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the settled position of law, this Court also feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petitions in terms of the orders passed by the learned coordinate Bench of this Court in the cases of M/S Harsh Construction (supra) and Uma Associates (supra) and accordingly in consequence thereof, the orders under challenge passed by the concerned respondent- Mines Development Officer, Kishanganj and duly affirmed by the District Collector-Kishanganj are hereby quashed and cancelled. The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Mining Corporation Limited, Patna is directed to refund the respective amount realised from the petitioners, if any, and also to ensure refund of the respective security of the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, if not refunded till date.
Patna High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - H Kumar - Full Document

Ramji Prasad Sinha vs The State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2023

6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the settled position of law, this Court also Patna High Court CWJC No.11767 of 2023 dt.21-09-2023 7/7 feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition in terms of the order passed by the learned coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Uma Associates (supra) and accordingly in consequence thereof, the impugned order of penalty as contained in letter no. 1532 dated 15.06.2023 by respondent no.4, Senior Additional District Magistrate cum Incharge Mineral Development Officer, Gaya, is hereby quashed and cancelled with a liberty to the respondents that if so advised, they will be at liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Patna High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - H Kumar - Full Document
1   2 Next