Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (1.07 seconds)
Documents citing V.Devan vs The Tahsildar on 22 December, 2020

A.Sureshbabu vs The Tahsildar on 2 August, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such applications.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

V.S. Saravanavel vs The Thasildar on 27 August, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondent has chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such application.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Thilagavathi vs The Tahsildar on 27 August, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such applications. 11/14 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P.Nos.13013 & 13420 of 2021
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

G. Ramkumar vs The Tahsildar on 9 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No.15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in http://www.judis.nic.in 10/14 WP No.18946 of 2021 denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such applications.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

J. Rajasekaran vs The District Collector on 1 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It was further observed in the said order that it is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondent has chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such application.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

K. Kumar vs The Tahsildar on 15 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It is rather unfortunate that even https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 10/13 WP No.19448 of 2021 inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such applications.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

J. Rajasekaran vs The District Collector on 1 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It was further observed in the said order that it is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondent has chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such application.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

Vimala vs The District Collector on 16 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It was further observed by this Court that it is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and have been rejecting such applications. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

S. Arasi vs The Tahsildar on 23 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It was further observed in that order that it is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heir also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and has been rejecting such applications.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document

R.Vanaja vs The District Collector on 21 September, 2021

In another order passed by this Court on 22.12.2020 in WP No. 15403 of 2020 (V. Devan vs. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Chennai) this Court, in para No.7 held that the respondents are not justified in denying the legal heirship certificate of late. Periyamadasamy Konar only on the ground that he did not have direct heirs. It was also observed that it is rather unfortunate that even inspite of the several orders of this Court directing the Tahsildar/Deputy Tahsildar to issue legal heir certificate for the Class II heirs also, the respondents have chosen to rely upon an outdated letter of the year 1991 and have been rejecting such applications.
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Mahadevan - Full Document
1   2 3 Next