Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

Sh.Uma Dutt vs Shri Srikant Baldi & Others on 9 December, 2015

15. rt We find no force in this submission for the simple reason that the work charge status of Class-III and IV was abolished on 19.6.2001 and 12.12.2005 respectively, whereas the judgment in Rakesh Kumar's case was rendered subsequently on 28.7.2010. It is for this reason that the Court being alive to such situation had qualified its decision by making it absolutely clear that the question of conferment of work-charged status would not arise in case the establishment ceased to be a work-charged establishment. Once such observation had been made in favour of the State, there was no question of assailing these observations before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Sh.Uma Dutt vs Shri Srikant Baldi & Others on 9 December, 2015

15. rt We find no force in this submission for the simple reason that the work charge status of Class-III and IV was abolished on 19.6.2001 and 12.12.2005 respectively, whereas the judgment in Rakesh Kumar's case was rendered subsequently on 28.7.2010. It is for this reason that the Court being alive to such situation had qualified its decision by making it absolutely clear that the question of conferment of work-charged status would not arise in case the establishment ceased to be a work-charged establishment. Once such observation had been made in favour of the State, there was no question of assailing these observations before the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1