Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Tehoo Ram And Ors. vs Dalip Singh And Anr. on 7 November, 1952

(O&M) Smt. Chawli Devi & Ors vs Inder Paul & Ors on 4 November, 2024

21. In that case the tenant who had originally purchased the property along with a stranger later, during the pendency of the suit got rid of the stranger by purchasing his interest. Unfortunately, neither the decision of Harnam Singh, J. in Tehoo Ram and others v. Dalip Singh and others, (supra) nor the Division Bench judgment in Tej Ram v. Puran chand, was brought to his Lordship's notice.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P Jain - Full Document

Suraj Bhan And Ors vs Niadri & Ors on 21 January, 2026

21. In that case the tenant who had originally purchased the property along with a stranger later, during the pendency of the suit got rid of the stranger by purchasing his interest. Unfortunately, neither the decision of Harnam Singh, J. in Tehoo Ram and others v. Dalip Singh and others, (supra) nor the Division Bench judgment in Tej Ram v. Puran chand, was brought to his Lordship's notice.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Garib Singh Kishan Singh vs Harnam Singh Kishan Singh And Ors. on 15 July, 1971

21. So far as this Court is concerned, this provision, Section 21-A of the Punjab Pre-emption Act came up for consideration in Tehoo Ram v. Dalip Singh, AIR 1953 Punj 128 where Harnam Singh, J., relying upon an earlier decision of this Court in Tej Ram v. Puran Chand, L. P. A. No. 76 of 1949, D/- 16-4-1951 (Punj) ruled that the improvement made in the status of some of the vendees after the institution of the suit for pre-emption cannot affect the right of the pre-emptors in that suit. In that case one of the six vendees was a stranger, and the question arose whether the other vendees who had the right of pre-emption equal to that of the pre-emptor could be permitted to improve their status by the sale made in their favour by their co-vendee during the pendency of the suit. In recording the above opinion, Harnam Singh, J. relied upon Section 21-A of the Punjab Pre-emption Act.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1