Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing P. Urmila Devi vs Director (Education), Govt. Of Nct Of ... on 4 July, 2011

Harpreet Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 15 July, 2019

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in Sudo Mandal @ Diwarak Mandal Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 (2) R.C.R (Criminal) 453; Gurpreet Singh @ Khinder Vs. State of Punjab, 1995 (2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 127, and another judgment passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Urmila Devi Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi,), 2007 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 246.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - M Bajaj - Full Document

Joginder Pal Singh vs State Of Punjab on 3 March, 2023

The Delhi High Court discharged the petitioner as the trial Court had disbelieved the testimony of Smt. Imarti and the other witnesses while acquitting all other co-accused and that the allegations against Mahesh, as made out in the statement of Smt. Imarti, are far greater than that against the present petitioner, in the case of Urmila Devi vs The State (NCT of Delhi) 2007 (1) RCR (Crl.) 246, quite similarly in the present case as well, the allegations against the brother of the petitioner were of having inflicted a 'kirch' blow on the head of the complainant and has been acquitted by learned trial Court, while the petitioner was attributed a danda blow, which struck the fingers of right hand of the complainant.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gurinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 29 August, 2023

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in Sudo Mandal @ Diwarak Mandal Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 (2) R.C.R (Criminal) 453; Gurpreet Singh @ Khinder Vs. State of Punjab, 1995 (2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 127, and another judgment passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Urmila Devi Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi,), 2007 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 246.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Gurinder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 29 August, 2023

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in Sudo Mandal @ Diwarak Mandal Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 (2) R.C.R (Criminal) 453; Gurpreet Singh @ Khinder Vs. State of Punjab, 1995 (2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 127, and another judgment passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Urmila Devi Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi,), 2007 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 246.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Gurinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 29 August, 2023

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in Sudo Mandal @ Diwarak Mandal Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 (2) R.C.R (Criminal) 453; Gurpreet Singh @ Khinder Vs. State of Punjab, 1995 (2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 127, and another judgment passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Urmila Devi Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi,), 2007 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 246.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Gurinder Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 29 August, 2023

In support of his arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by this Court in Sudo Mandal @ Diwarak Mandal Vs. State of Punjab, 2011 (2) R.C.R (Criminal) 453; Gurpreet Singh @ Khinder Vs. State of Punjab, 1995 (2) R.C.R.(Criminal) 127, and another judgment passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Urmila Devi Vs. State (N.C.T of Delhi,), 2007 (1) R.C.R.(Criminal) 246.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document

Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab on 27 January, 2012

In another case, the Single Bench of Delhi High Court titled as Urmila Devi vs. The State (NCT of Delhi), (Delhi) reported as 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 246 while relying on various judgments of Hon'ble the Apex Court and the other High Courts quashed the proceedings against the petitioner under Section 304-B/34 IPC, as all the co-accused were acquitted and there was no question of invoking Section 34 IPC. Para 5 of the said judgment reads as under :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Parminder Singh @ Sherry vs State Of Punjab And Another on 10 May, 2012

In another case, the Single Bench of Delhi High Court titled as Urmila Devi vs. The State (NCT of Delhi), (Delhi) reported as 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 246 while relying on various judgments of Hon'ble the Apex Court and the other High Courts quashed the proceedings against the petitioner under Section 304-B/34 IPC, as all the co-accused were acquitted and there was no question of invoking Section 34 IPC. Para 5 of the said judgment reads as under :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Amaninder Singh @Maninder Singh vs State Of Punjab on 15 April, 2024

22 of 31 ::: Downloaded on - 16-04-2024 03:34:13 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:049738 CRM-M-17709-2022 #23# 2024:PHHC:049738 In another case, the Single Bench of Delhi High Court titled as Urmila Devi v. The State (NCT of Delhi), (Delhi) reported as 2007(1) RCR (Criminal) 246 while relying on various judgments of Hon'ble the Apex Court and the other High Courts quashed the proceedings against the petitioner under section 304B/34 IPC, as all the co-accused were acquitted and there was no question of invoking Section 34 I.P.C. Para 5 of the said judgment reads as under :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - J S Bedi - Full Document
1   2 Next