Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.62 seconds)

Sachin Dutta vs State Of U.P. And Another on 3 March, 2023

In the case of Amitbhai Anilchandra Shah (supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the applicability of 'consequence test' as laid down in the case of C. Muniappan and others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu; (2010) 9 SCC 567 and has held that there can be no fresh investigation on receipt of every subsequent information in respect of the same cognizable offence or the same occurence or incident giving rise to one more cognizable offence. It has further been held that the second FIR is permissible in the case of cross cases and it is also permissible if the offence disclosed does not form part of the first FIR or it cannot be said to be part of the same transaction as covered by the first FIR or cannot be said to be arising as a consequence of the offence covered by the first FIR.
Allahabad High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

M/S Shri Balaji Hi-Tech Constructions ... vs C.B.I. And Another on 8 November, 2024

In this regard, counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments of Apex Court in the cases of T.T. Antony Vs. State of Kerala; (2001) 6 SCC 181 and Amitbhai Anichandra Shah Vs. CBI; (2013) 6 SCC 348. Lastly, it is submitted that petitioner is languishing in jail since 10.03.2017, whereas instant FIR has been lodged on 02.08.2017, which shows that during lodgment of impugned FIR, petitioner was in jail and was not aware, as to how, impugned FIR has been lodged against him, therefore, the present case is nothing but an abuse of process of law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 84 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document
1