Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 375 (4.77 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Punjab & Anr vs Jalour Singh & Ors on 18 January, 2008

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 96 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

Muppavarapu Chowdary And Leela Krishna ... vs Ibrahim Uddin And on 6 March, 2026

In State of Punjab v. Jalour Singh (Supra), it was held that where an award is made by a Lok Adalat in terms of a settlement between the parties, it is final and binding and executable as a decree, and that no appeal lies 37 2025 SCC Online SC 2737 (paras 14 & 15) 91 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.3325 of 2020 & batch against it. It was further held that any challenge to such an award must be brought before the High Court in proceedings under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India and only on limited grounds such as lack of consent, jurisdictional error or fraud.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 97 - Cited by 0 - R R Rao - Full Document

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board vs The District Legal Services Authority on 8 April, 2017

30. The Code again gives room for such a person, under Order XLIII Rule1A, where an appeal can be maintained by a litigant pleading that the compromise itself should not have been recorded. The other option given to a person is to approach the very same court, to point out the court ought not to have recorded the compromise. Taking note of this position, the Supreme Court in the State of Punjab & Another v. Jalour Singh & Others, (2008) 2 SCC 660 held that the remedy for a person aggrieved by a Lok Adalat Award is to present a writ petition invoking Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next