Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.87 seconds)
Documents citing Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan vs Sinter Plast Containers on 29 June, 2007

Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited vs Kailashben Yogendra Shankar Pandya on 6 January, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 2 - A Joshi - Full Document

Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limited vs Kailashben Yogendra Shankar Pandya on 6 January, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Nainesh Girishkumar Panchal vs Chirag Girishkumar Panchal on 8 March, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a Page 4 of 7 Downloaded on : Tue Mar 09 20:20:12 IST 2021 C/CA/134/2021 ORDER litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer (Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer(Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer(Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Nainesh Girishkumar Panchal vs Chirag Girishkumar Panchal on 8 March, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a Page 4 of 7 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 13 06:47:59 IST 2022 C/CA/134/2021 ORDER litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer(Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer(Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document

Defence Estate Officer (Deesa Air ... vs State Of Gujarat on 1 October, 2021

"As far as the decisions relied upon by Mr. Dave the same are not applicable to the facts of the present case since in the reference, the case of the employees was being represented by Union leader and he informed the employees to remain present only when called for. They were never aware about dismissal of the reference and where never informed that the reference was dismissed for want of prosecution. The Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rajesh Pukhraj Chauhan v. Sinter Plast Containers and another has held that it is trite that a litigant is permitted to litigate for his rights by having a decision from the Court of law on merits, rather than he is ousted on technical ground. A liberal approach is not out of place."
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A Joshi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next