Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. And Anr vs Lalsaram on 23 February, 2001

Ramakant Tiwari vs State Of U.P. & Others on 9 November, 2017

This Court may at this stage refer to judgments rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in matters relating to compulsory retirement. It had earlier been held that promotion of an employee would mean that the work and conduct of such employee was satisfactory, but the Supreme Court in State of Punjab Vs. Guru Dev Singh 1998 (4) SCC 92 and again in State of U.P. Vs. Vijay Kumar Jain 2002 (3) SCC 641 and in State of U.P. Vs. Lalsaram 2001 (3) SCC 389 have held that mere promotion of an employee would not render the whole service tenure of the employee concerned as satisfactory, and adverse entries even before promotion can be taken into consideration for the purpose of compulsory retirement.
Allahabad High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1