Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 58 (0.04 seconds)
Documents citing Santosh Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgahr 37 ... on 18 May, 2018

Santosh vs Usha Devi @ Usha Mann And Ors on 9 September, 2024

15.The afore stated cheque was presented by the complainant for encashment to his bank ie. Corporation Bank, Nehru Enclave Branch,.The cheque was returned back dishonored vide return memo dated 20.07.2018. with reason "funds insufficient" (Ex.CW1/2). Complainant thereafter gave legal demand notice to the accused on 14.08.2018 (Ex.CW1/3) calling upon him to make payment within 15 days from notice. The said notice was sent by the Speed Post. Despite the service the accused did CC No. 4023/2018 Santosh Vs. Usha Devi @ Usha Mann & Anr. 4 of 13 not make the payment within stipulated period. There is presumption in favor of the complainant under section 139 NI Act as signatures on cheque are admitted by the accused. Accused dis not give any stop payment instructions to bank.
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Sahu vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 October, 2024

7. Considering the aforesaid judgements, this Court directs the learned Civil Judge (S.D.)/FTC (14th Finance Commission)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi to conclude the trial of Case No.1128 of 2023 (Santosh Kumar Sahu Vs. Ratan Lal Ahirwar), u/s 138 of the Act, 1881, Police Station-Sipiri Bazar, District-Jhansi, keeping in mind the direction of the Apex Court in above mentioned cases, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with statutory provision of Sections 143(2) and 143(3) of the Act, 1881, if there is no legal impediment.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar vs The State (Gnctd) And Anr on 17 November, 2025

1. The Petitioner had filed CRL.REV.P 93/2025 titled Santosh Kumar v. Suresh Bansal & Anr., assailing the order of the SDM under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In the said petition, by order dated 21st March, 2025, the operation of the impugned SDM order was stayed. Then, Respondent No. 2 and others appeared on service of summons and the interim direction was continued from time to time. However, the said proceedings eventually came to be dismissed by the impugned order dated 9th October, 2025. The impugned order reads as follows:
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Narula - Full Document

Santosh Singh vs State Of U.P. And 8 Others on 10 September, 2025

3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to decide the stay application filed by petitioner in Eviction Suit No. 6529 of 2025 (Santosh Singh & Another Vs. Paarasnath & Others), Computerized Case No. T-202505470106529, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Agarwal - Full Document

Manisha Kumari vs Santosh Kumar on 7 July, 2023

2 of this Court’s order dated 22.03.2023 is rectified to say that Money Suit No. 160 of 2022 titled as “Santosh Kumar v. Manisha Kumari” pending before the Court of Civil Judge No. 3, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, Assam is ordered to be transferred to the Court of Civil Judge at Prayagraj/Allahabad, District Prayagraj/Allahabad.” Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar vs State Of Up And 3 Ors on 16 September, 2019

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application under section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction to the A.C.J.M.-5th, Jaunpur to decide the Case No. 124 of 2018 (Santosh Kumar Vs. Nandini Devi and others), under section 340 Cr.P.C., P.S. Chandvak, District Jaunpur expeditiously in accordance with law.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - B Lal - Full Document

Prahlad Singh And Another vs Santosh Singh on 2 August, 2023

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.18, Deoria to decide the Case No.74 of 2018 (Santosh Singh Vs. Prahlad Singh and another) pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment in deciding the aforesaid case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next