Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Goldendunes Heights Llp, Jaipur on 23 September, 2025

5.2.6 In view of abovementioned facts and circumstances the additional evidence submitted by the appellant is admitted and taken into account while disposing off the appeal. Decisions of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs Virgin Securities and Credits Pvt. Ltd (2011) 332 ITR 396 (Delhi) and CIT vs Chandrakant Chanubhai Patel 202 taxmann 262 (delhi) are also relied upon in this regard.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chhitubhai N. Patel , Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax

6. On the other hand, the ld. Counsel for the assessee, at the outset, submits that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for the A.Y. 2006-07 in ITA No. 5238/Mum/2009 dtd. 20-12-2010, upheld by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in CIT vs. Shri Chhitubhai N. Patel in Income Tax Appeal (LOD) No. 686 of 2011 dtd. 5th August, 2011 and in Revenue's appeal in ITA No. 3361/Mum/2011 for A.Y. 2008-09 dtd. 16- 5-2012. He also placed on record a copy of the said orders/judgments.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1