Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)

Sh. Subhash Chand Jain vs Shiv Kumar Tyagi @ Satish Tyagi on 4 October, 2021

vii. Ex. PW1/7 : Complaint dated 02.12.2009. viii. Ex. PW1/8 : Complaint dated 18.12.2009. CS No. 390/16 Page 7 of 20 Subhash Chand v. Shiv Kumar Tyagi & ors. ix. Ex. PW1/9 : Photographs. to Ex. PW1/15 x. Ex. PW1/16 : Status report filed by police before Hon'ble Delhi High Court. xi. Ex. PW1/17 : FIR registered bearing no. 262/09. xii. Ex. PW1/18 : Order passed subsequent to FIR registered. xiii. Mark 19 : The copy of WP(Crl) no. 1090/09. xiv. Ex. PW1/20 : Documents pertaining to business relating to to the goods lying in the suit property.
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Subhash Chand vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 3 February, 2023

2. Challenge has been raised to the orders dated 16.05.2016 and 24.12.2016, whereby the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Ghaziabad has issued notice to the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 to participate in the proceedings in Case No. 2982 of 2015 (Subhash Chand Vs. Mukesh Tyagi & Anr.) instituted under Section 340 Cr.P.C., Police Station - Kavi Nagar, District - Ghaziabad. Further, challenge has been raised to the order dated 20.10.2022 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Ghaziabad, whereby Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2017 arising from those orders, has been rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

Keshav Ram Thru. Kamla Prasad Maurya vs Smt. Munni Devi & Ors. on 30 August, 2019

From a perusal of the order dated 23.05.2019, challenged in this writ petition, it is apparent that the appellate court has interfered in the order of the learned trial court on the ground that there are only three conditions for grant of temporary injunction, which three conditions have not been fulfilled by the learned trial court and no consideration thereof has been undertaken by the learned trial court while passing the order dated 24.04.2014. The appellate court has referred to Two Judgements of this Court, namely M/s. Savvy Homes Vs. Nikhil Induksh, 2012 All.C.J. 309 and Subhash Chandra Sharma Vs. Smt. Rajni Tyagi, 2014, All.C.J. 1767, to observe that the balance of convenience, the question of irreparable loss and prima facie case should have been considered before the order of status quo should have been passed by the learned trial court.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document
1