Jamshed K. Tarachand vs Soonabai on 2 December, 1907
Peshotam v. Meherbai (1888) I.L.R. 13 Bom.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.99 seconds)Documents citing
Peshotam Hormasji Dustoor vs Meherbai on 25 September, 1888
Jamshedji Cursetjee Tarachand vs Soonabai And Ors. on 2 December, 1907
See Dhanjibhai Bomanji Gujrat v. Navazbai 2 B. 75; Mithibai v. Limji Nowroji Banoji 5 B. 506; on appeal 6 B. 151; Peshotam, Hormasji Dustoor v. Meherbai 13 B. 302; Byramji Bhimjibhai v. Jamsetji Nowroji Kapadia 16 B. 630 and Shapurji Bezonjee Motiwalla v. Dossabhoy Bezonjee Motiwalla 30 B. 359. However interesting or important this discussion may be, on a fuller consideration of the case now before me, I have come to the conclusion that for present purposes it is wholly unnecessary to discuss this question here. I will proceed with the consideration of the question as to whether this is a valid Trust in law or not on the basis that English law applied to this trust. Once the nature of the ceremonies for which the trust is created is clearly understood, the question of law presents no difficulty whatever.
Sir Dinshaw Manockji Petit And Ors. vs Sir Jamsetji Jeejeebhoy And Ors. on 27 November, 1908
In Peshotam Hormasji Dustoor v. Bai Meherbai 13 B. 302 the late Mr. Justice Scott held that usage must prevail over tenets. He says:
Hatimbhai Hassanally vs Framroz Eduljee Dinshaw on 31 January, 1927
There the Despatch accompanying the new rules of the Bombay Government was not held to be entirely inadmissible in considering the scope or meaning of the rules. The Despatch has also been more than once referred to by Judges of this Court in construing the Letters Patent: see Peshotam Hormansji Dustoor v. Meherbai (1888) I.L.R. 13 Bom.
1