Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 107 (0.97 seconds)
Documents citing Airport Authority Of India vs Centre For Aviation Policy, Safety And ... on 30 September, 2022

Quality Property Management Service vs Tamil Nadu Textbook And Educational ... on 20 April, 2023

Learned Additional Advocate General also relied upon the judgment of the Hon'b le Supreme Court of India in Airport Authority of India Vs. Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety & Research (CAPSR) & Ors. (cited supra), more-specifically relying upon paragraph Nos.3.5 and 3.6 to contend that it is within the ambit and policy decision of the Tender Making Authority to frame the conditions and it is 1 MANU/SC/0740/2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 11/19 W.A.No.660 of 2023 outside the scope of judicial scrutiny.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Quality Property Management Service vs Tamil Nadu Textbook And Educational ... on 20 April, 2023

Learned Additional Advocate General also relied upon the judgment of the Hon'b le Supreme Court of India in Airport Authority of India Vs. Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety & Research (CAPSR) & Ors. (cited supra), more-specifically relying upon paragraph Nos.3.5 and 3.6 to contend that it is within the ambit and policy decision of the Tender Making Authority to frame the conditions and it is 1 MANU/SC/0740/2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 11/19 W.A.No.660 of 2023 outside the scope of judicial scrutiny.
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B.S.Enterprises vs The Principal Chief Conservator Of ... on 6 March, 2023

“17...it amply clear that the author of the tender document is taken to be the best person to understand and appreciate its requirements; and if its interpretation is manifestly in consonance with the language of the tender document or subserving the purchase of the tender, the Court would prefer to keep restraint. Further to that, the technical evaluation or comparison by the Court is impermissible; and even if the interpretation given to the tender document by the person inviting offers is not as such acceptable to the Constitutional https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 9/16 W.P.No.8902 of 2023 Court, that, by itself, would not be a reason for interfering with the interpretation given.” “24...the process of interpretation of terms and conditions is essentially left to the author of the tender document and the occasion for interference by the Court would arise only if the questioned decision fails on the salutary tests laid down and settled by this Court in consistent decisions, namely, irrationality or unreasonableness or bias or procedural impropriety.” In the case of Airport Authority of India Vs. Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety & Research (CAPSR) & Others reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 814, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows:
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next