Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (2.75 seconds)
Documents citing Osman Shaikh vs The State Of West Bengal & Others on 8 April, 2019

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document

Minakshi Ghosh & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 December, 2025

(viii) The instant proceeding suffers from inexcusable delay and laches, by which petitioners are challenging a recruitment process which is in aid of initial recruitment initiated in the year 2016, there was a finite number of applicants who were in the realm of the consideration in 34 2016. The answering respondents upon receipt of recommendation letters had their rights crystallized under the 2016 recruitment process. Reliance in this regard is placed on the decision of the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of OSMAN ALI SEKH vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. reported in 2006 SCC OnLine Cal 776 to contend that once the commission issues recommendation right to appointment automatically flows from such recommendation and refusal to issue the appointment letter is a gross irregularity.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 72 - Cited by 0 - B Basu - Full Document
1