Ca 8/14 D.O D 24.5.2014 Anil Kumar vs Shilpa Modi & Anrs on 24 May, 2014
d) Ridhima Juneja vs Deven Juneja & Ors, Crl MC no.2748/2010
(DHC),date of decision 30.10.2012.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.30 seconds)Documents citing
Ridhima Juneja vs Deven Juneja on 13 January, 2014
Ca 8/14 D.O D 24.5.2014 Anil Kumar vs Shilpa Modi & Anrs on 24 May, 2014
d) Ridhima Juneja vs Deven Juneja & Ors, Crl MC no.2748/2010
(DHC),date of decision 30.10.2012.
Appellant vs Viniti Aggarwal on 28 January, 2017
9. Per contra, it was submitted by learned counsel for respondent
Viniti Aggarwal that maintenance granted in the impugned order is
not sufficient and requires enhancement. He submitted that the
present case is a classic case of wealthy son of wealthy parents
becoming extremely poor when he is to pay maintenance after a
matrimonial dispute. He relied upon judgments titled as Puneet
Kaur Vs. Inderjeet Singh Sawhney, (2012) ILR I Delhi 73, Vikas
Ahluwalia Vs. Simran Ahluwalia, 206 (2014) DLT 709 and
Ridhima Juneja Vs. Deven Juneja & Ors., 2013 (1) Crimes 263.
Smt. Abhilasha vs Shri Banwari Lal on 8 June, 2018
This
principle was followed in Master Ryan through his mother Mrs. Ridhima
Juneja Vs. PN Juneja & sons (HUF) 2009 (163) DLT 144.
Minatirani Mohapatra, vs Mahesh Prasad Mishra on 8 August, 2025
ii. Ridhima Juneja v. Deven Juneja and Ors., judgment dated 08.03.2017
passed by learned predecessor bench of this Court in CONT.CAS(C)
1039/2016.
Rekha Rani vs Harmeharban Singh on 23 March, 2018
Learned counsel for respondent has relied upon the authorities
in Ridhima Juneja vs. Deven Juneja, 2014(17) RCR (Civil) 466, Anamika
Pandey vs. Shrihar Pandey, 2015(57) RCR (Civil) 318 and Surajmukhi vs.
1 of 2
::: Downloaded on - 14-05-2018 13:33:44 :::
TA-545-2017 (O&M) 2
Chhotu Ram, 2008(17) RCR (Civil) 698 and pressed that the convenience of
the wife is not to be always considered.
1