Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (1.12 seconds)

Ms. Tanvi Chaturvedi vs Ms. Smita Shrivastava & Anr on 29 August, 2025

42. Similarly, in Aparna Choudhrie Kala (supra), this Court allowed the production and preservation of telephonic call details, mobile tower data, and hotel records in a case alleging adultery. The Court emphasized that preventing such evidence from being brought before the Family Court would not serve the interest of justice. The records were to be preserved by third parties to prevent destruction and produced at the appropriate stage of trial, ensuring that the parties' privacy concerns were balanced against the right to a fair trial. This reinforces the principle that circumstantial evidence, particularly hotel stays, travel logs, and communications, is crucial in establishing allegations of adultery and cannot be summarily rejected as speculative.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S Surge Industries Ltd And Ors vs Kamal Gupta And Anr on 13 October, 2025

24. Learned counsel for the Defendants would assert that such a rigid and pedantic interpretation of procedural provisions is contrary to settled law, for procedure is always intended to be a handmaiden of justice and not its mistress, and the rules must therefore be interpreted in a manner that advances the cause of justice rather than defeats it; and in support of this proposition reliance would be placed upon Aparna Choudhrie Kala v. Vaibhav Kala9.
Delhi High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1