Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.27 seconds)

The Commissioner vs Sri R Adhikesavulu Naidu on 31 January, 2023

9. It is also pertinent to note that the aforesaid judgments rendered by various division benches of this court have been accepted by the authority and have not been further assailed. It is also not in dispute that the order dated 14.09.2017 passed in W.A.No.3353/2016 has been upheld by Hon'ble The Supreme Court as the Special Leave Petition passed against judgment of division bench of this court has been dismissed on 14.09.2017 in SLP (Civil) Diary No.28329/2019 (BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SAMPANGI AND ORS.). It is well settled in law that an order or
Karnataka High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Commissioner vs R. Adhikesavulu Naidu on 25 August, 2025

We find from the record that the earlier Division Benches’ judgments of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, and more particularly, the judgment dated 14.09.2017 in Writ Appeal No. 3353/2016 and 5170-5174/2016 (LA-BDA), categorically held that the scheme, that is, J.P. Nagar VIII Phase Scheme, had already lapsed. This judgment was tested before this Court in SLP(C) Nos. 26800- 26805/2018, titled “Bangalore Development Authority & Anr. vs. Sampangi & Ors.”, and the same were dismissed.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1