Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.26 seconds)

Gurnam Singh vs Govt. Of Nctd on 10 October, 2017

It is further observed in the order of the Tribunal that in case the applicant is found to be identical to the applicant in OA No.98/2015 (Som Prakash Vs. GNCTD), then similar relief may be granted to the applicant therein. Shri Ahuja thus argued that this OA may also be disposed of on the similar lines with a direction to the respondents to decide the aforesaid three pending representations of the applicant.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Om Prakash Chopra vs Govt. Of Nctd on 26 April, 2018

3. The applicant states that the respondents implemented the order of this Tribunal passed in OA-98/2015 (Som Prakash Vs. GNCTD & Ors.) on 26.11.2015, which was decided relying upon the judgment of Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Rafiq Masih & Ors., 2014(8)SCALE 613 and also DoP&T O.M. dated 02.03.2016 holding that any recovery from the Class-III and Class-IV (Group-C & D Services) retired employees or the employees due to retire within one year, would be impermissible. Therefore, the respondents were directed not to recover any amount from the applicant herein and in case they have recovered some amount, the same should be refunded within 15 days.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1