Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)

Adesh Jain vs Sebi on 6 January, 2023

23. In addition to the aforesaid, this Tribunal in similar GDR issues have taken the view that non-executive independent directors cannot be found guilty for violation of PFUTP Regulations. These decisions are in Appeal no.389 of 2021, Prafull Anubhai Shah v. SEBI decided on 28th June, 2021; Appeal no.433 of 2021, Rajesh Shah v. SEBI decided on 5th July, 2021; Appeal no.58 of 2021, Jaiprakash Kabra v. SEBI decided on September 2, 2021; Appeal no.338 of 2021, H.S. Anand & Ors. v. SEBI decided on 20th 21 September, 2021 and Appeal no.211 of 2019, Govind Das Pasari v. SEBI decided on 30th April, 2021.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - T Agarwala - Full Document

Yogendra Premkrishna Trivedi vs Sebi on 3 November, 2022

In Appeal no. 338 of 2021, Mr. H.S. Anand vs SEBI and other companion appeals decided on September 20, 2021 it was found that the said appellant after attending the only meeting in which the resolution was passed took no further part in any subsequent board meetings of the committee and was not associated with the issuance of the GDR issue. This Tribunal held that once the finding has been given that he was not involved in the financials of the Company it was no longer open to the respondent to penalize the said appellant.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - T Agarwala - Full Document

Dr. Chandra Prakash & Ors. vs Sebi on 25 April, 2023

7. In this regard, the appellant shall appear before the relevant authority concerned on 10th May, 2023 on which date the appellants will be served with the show cause notice and the matter will proceed thereafter. We may also observe that the authority will also take into consideration the order of this Tribunal in the matter of I.S. Sukhija vs. SEBI, Appeal no.408 of 2020 and other connected appeals decided on 20th September, 2021.
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - T Agarwala - Full Document
1