Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.90 seconds)
Documents citing 1. Branch Manager, United India ... vs Smt. Sandhya Bhagat Wife Of Shri Parmod ... on 18 October, 2012

Aegon Religare Lic vs Poonam Jain on 3 April, 2017

On the other hand, our own State Commission has held in case titled as "Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Parmod Chander" 2001(1)CPC-37 that doctor appointed by the insurer for medical checkup did not mention about such disease at the time of filling up the proposal form and thereafter repudiated the insurance claim. The onus is strictly upon insurance company to prove that disease was actually and fraudulently concealed.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Senior Divisional Manager, vs Mangal W/O Sanjeev Balaganavi, on 9 October, 2020

16. Again Durgamma case was referred to by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of United India Insurance Company Limited, by its Divisional Manager Vs. Sandhya in MFA No.102428/2017 decided on 07.06.2019 and the Davison Bench of this Court approved the view taken in Durgamma case. Hence, the argument of the Insurance Company that because of violation of permit conditions, saddling the liability on the Insurance Company is erroneous cannot be countenanced in law.
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Smt.Geeta W/O Honnappa Naikar vs Sri.Basavaraj S/O Hanumappa Karjagi on 7 October, 2020

Insofar as first contention is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the Division Bench ruling in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd, by its Divisional Manager vs. Sandhya in MFA.No.102428 of 2017 decided on 07.06.2019, wherein the Division Bench of this Court has clearly held that violation in respect of the policy terms and fastening the liability on the owner of the vehicle exonerating the Insurance Company is not tenable.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document

Sri.Kallappa S/O Hanumanthappa ... vs Sri.Basavaraj S/O Hanumappa Karjagi on 7 October, 2020

Insofar as first contention is concerned, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the Division Bench ruling in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd, by its Divisional Manager vs. Sandhya in MFA.No.102428 of 2017 decided on 07.06.2019, wherein the Division Bench of this Court has clearly held that violation in respect of the policy terms and fastening the liability on the owner of the vehicle exonerating the Insurance Company is not tenable. On close scrutiny of the judgment of the Division Bench, there is sufficient force in the argument made on behalf of appellant and hence on that core the Insurance Company cannot be exonerated. Relevant portion of the said judgment is culled out hereunder:
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document
1