citedby: 5035823

3 June vs State Of Uttarakhand on 3 June, 2025

10. Per contra, learned State counsel would submit that this complaint case was filed prior to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court 'Indian Medical Association' (supra), however, he would fairly concede 7 2025:UHC:4704 that in the impugned order, the summoning was done on the report of the Senior Food Security Officer, however, that may be a typographical mistake.

Uttarakhand High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - V B Sharma - Full Document

Swami Ramdev vs John Doe (S) And Ors on 18 February, 2026

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 20:33:40 COVID-19, Plaintiff had publicly stated that 'Allopathy is a stupid and bankrupt science' and 'more people died of Allopathic treatment that those who died of oxygen shortage or because of COVID-19' and advertised his Ayurvedic product 'Coronil' as cure for COVID-19. This had attracted negative response from a number of doctors, citizens as also the Central Government and in fact, the Supreme Court had directed the Plaintiff to refrain from making such statements in order dated 27.02.2024 passed in Indian Medical Association and Another v. Union of India and Others, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2328. It is further submitted that these posts are merely a commentary on these newsworthy events of public importance and in any event, the mere fact that the Plaintiff is displeased or annoyed with the posts does not give rise to actionable right to censor free speech.

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

M/S.Dharma Pharmacy Pvt. Ltd., vs The State Of Tamilnadu, on 9 April, 2026

__________ Page8 of 19 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP Nos. 27548 of 2016 and 4847 of 2017 that since the prohibition under the Act is in respect of advertisements of certain drugs, no specific qualification is required for the Drugs Inspector(s) to launch the prosecution; and that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Indian Medical Association and another Vs. Union of India and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No.645/2022 dated 26.03.2025 had issued directions to all the States and Union Territories of India to be followed for initiating action under the Act.

Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - A Sumanth - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar vs Kewal Krishan And Others on 12 May, 2026

9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Indian Medical Association & Another Vs. Union of India & Others" (2024) 19 SCC 193, has held that:-

Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Resident Doctors Association, All ... vs Ram Kishan Yadav Alias Swami Ramdev And ... on 15 December, 2023

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2023 at 21:17:17 Supreme Court in W.P.(C) No. 645/2022 titled Indian Medical Association & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors., whereby the Supreme Court has clarified as follows:

Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A J Bhambani - Full Document

Resident Doctors Association, All ... vs Ram Kishan Yadav Alias Swami Ramdev And ... on 2 May, 2024

% 02.05.2024 CS(OS) 320/2021 and I.A. 8420/2021 Mr. Kotla Harshvardhan, learned counsel for the plaintiff has brought to the notice of this court a series of orders made by the Supreme Court in W.P. No. 645/2022 titled Indian Medical Association & Anr. vs. Union of CS(OS) 320/2021 Page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.