Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (2.13 seconds)
Documents citing Jasbir Singh @ Jassa vs The State Of Punjab on 9 December, 2021

Korada Rajababu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 April, 2022

Hence, the principle laid down in Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana (referred supra) is directly applicable to the present facts of the case and principle in Jasbir Singh @ Jassa vs. State of Punjab (referred supra) is not applicable, in view of the factual distinction. That too, both the learned single Judges in the writ petitions, while exercising criminal jurisdiction, passed the orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 28 - Cited by 1 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Lakshmi Padma Priya Anjana Devi Thallam vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 April, 2022

Hence, the principle laid down in Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana (referred supra) is directly applicable to the present facts of the case and principle in Jasbir Singh @ Jassa vs. State of Punjab (referred supra) is not applicable, in view of the factual distinction. That too, the learned single Judge in the writ petition, while exercising criminal jurisdiction, passed the orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Kulbir Singh @ Goldy vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 24 January, 2024

"13. In the backdrop of the case law discussed above, facts of the present case may be examined. There is nothing on record to show that conduct of the petitioner in jail has not been found good. The petitioner has never been released on parole earlier. He is involved in three other cases, out of which he was acquitted in one case and in the remaining two cases, he was convicted and sentenced to the period already undergone and was ordered to pay fine which he has deposited. No doubt, the other three cases in which the petitioner was involved were also under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, yet the likelihood of his involvement in similar offence while on parole is not be taken as an active and real apprehension of threat to the security of the State or to the maintenance of public order as held in Manjit Singh @ Laddu's case (supra). Moreover, the respondents have not placed on record any material to support the apprehension. Merely on the basis of an apprehension, benefit of parole cannot be denied."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next