Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.27 seconds)
Documents citing Jagat Singh (Deceased) Though His Legal ... vs Punjab State Electricity Board And ... on 29 November, 2012

Ram Nath And Others vs Addl. Commissioner (Admn.), Varanasi ... on 28 January, 2015

6.Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand, relies upon a judgment in Smt. Dhanpati (Dead) through Legal Representatives vs. Board of Revenue and others: 2003 (94) RD 690 to contend that the revision has rightly been held to have abated. It has been stated that the restoration application was allowed, which was under challenge in revision, and therefore, the proceedings of the suit itself had revived, which as a consequence of section 5(2) of the U.P.C.H. Act was liable to have been abated.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - A K Mishra - Full Document

Bal Vikas Samiti (Regd) vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board on 13 October, 2020

3. On the plain reading of the plaint, it is thus evident that the plaintiff does not plead as to when he came in possession of the suit land so as to plead the point of start of adverse possession as is required to be stated, as held by the Supreme Court in the decision reported as (2018) 11 SCC 449 Dharampal (Dead) through Legal Representatives Vs. Punjab Waqf Board and Others. In the decision, it was held:-
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M Gupta - Full Document

General Manager vs Amrik Singh And Another on 10 May, 2013

10. Counsel for the respondent-workman on the other hand took the plea that it was recurring cause of action and placed reliance upon the judgments in State of Punjab Vs. Mohan Singh 2007(3) S.C.T. 751, Yog Raj Mittal, since deceased through his Legal Representatives Vs. State of Punjab and others 2008(2) S.C.T. 395 and Swaran Singh Vs. The State of Punjab 2010(3) PLR 465.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document
1