Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.59 seconds)

Ilaben Pankajbhai Bharvad vs State Of Gujarat on 13 February, 2025

9. In the case in hand, it is not the case of the petitioner that she was not present in the meeting. The participation of the petitioner without any demur or objection and then permitting the No Confidence Motion to move against her cannot turn around and contain that there is a duty cast upon on the part of the person who has presided over the meeting to call upon such person to speak even if she is not willing and such fact in the minutes of the meeting is required to be recorded. At this stage, it is apposite to refer to the decision of this Court in the case of Laljibhai Ramjibhai Makwana vs. The District Development Officer in LPA No.930 of 2021 dated 27.10.2021, wherein it is held as under:
Gujarat High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Hitendrasih Pravinsinh Zala vs Taluka Vikas Adhikari on 30 November, 2021

6.3 From the Division Bench decision of this Court in the case of Laljibhai Ramjibhai Makwana (supra), what is evident is that if the Sarpanch does not even oppose the No Confidence Motion, or does not even attempt to address the meeting, it cannot be said that there is a denial of opportunity to speak at the said meeting. 7 In a given case, if a person against whom No Confidence Motion is moved were to sit at the said meeting, does not speak at the meeting and participates without any demur cannot turn around and contend that it is the duty cast on the part of the person who presides over the meeting to call upon such person to speak.
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - B Vaishnav - Full Document
1