Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 73 (4.43 seconds)
Documents citing Ms. Aruna Roy And Others vs Union Of India And Others on 12 September, 2002

Xl-Iit Forum And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 27 May, 2003

In Aruna Rai v. Union of India, 2002 (7) SCC 368, the Supreme Court has observed that it is for Parliament to take a decision on National Education Policy one way or other. It is not for the Court to decide on good or bad points in the educational policy. The Courts have a limited jurisdiction to intervene in implementation of the policy only if it finds it to be against any provision of the Constitution.
Allahabad High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 4 - M Katju - Full Document

Krishna Yadav vs The State Of Bihar Through Home ... on 30 April, 2019

67. The Court then went on to letter its opinion to raise therein of allowing the use of Hindi as a medium of Patna High Court CR. WJC No.435 of 2015 dt.30 -04-2019 99/155 answering questions in the departmental promotion examinations of the High Court where also the judgment is illustrated as to why English also is a necessary language. The knowledge whereof is purposeful for Court work. The use of a particular language English as a medium of instruction depending upon the curriculum also came up for consideration before the Apex Court in the case of Ms. Aruna Roy and Others vs. Union of India and Others reported in (2002) 7 SCC 368. The debates relating to religious instruction that was discussed in the Constituent Assembly and in the Parliament vis-à-vis the recognition and acknowledgment of religious languages has been considered in the said judgment.
Patna High Court Cites 73 - Cited by 5 - A P Sahi - Full Document

Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 21 July, 2020

meaning "religion which is immutable, constant, living, permanent and ever in existence". Religion, in a wide sense, is those fundamental principles which sustain life and without which life will not survive. Rig Veda describes Dharma as Athodharmani Dharayan. In this concept of religion or Sanathana Dharma, different faiths, sects and schools of thoughts are, merely, different ways of knowing the truth which is one. The various sects or religious groups are understood as Panth or Sampradaya. (A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu[3]; and Aruna Roy and Ors. v. Union of India[66]).
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 195 - Cited by 0 - R C Khulbe - Full Document

Rajeev Suri vs Union Of India on 5 January, 2021

35. To support their case, the petitioners have made reference to M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.27, Automotive Tyre Manufacturers Association v. Designated Authority & Ors.28, State of U.P. & Ors. v. Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh & Ors.29, Aruna Roy & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.30, Travancore Rayon Ltd. v. Union of India31, Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v. Union of India32, Utkarsh Mandal v. Union of India33, R.K. Mittal34, Rajendra Shankar Shukla & Ors. v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.35, S.N. Chandrashekar & Anr. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.36, Lal Bahadur37, Bangalore Medical Trust38 and Virender Gaur & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.39.
Supreme Court of India Cites 281 - Cited by 6 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next