Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 30 (1.67 seconds)
Documents citing State Trading Corporation Of India ... vs S.S. Mohte And Company Registered Firm ... on 23 June, 1980

State vs Suraj Kashyap on 24 January, 2025

28. On 15.03.2018, the exhibits were sent to FSL through Ct. Mukesh. On 01.05.2018, the hard disk was also sent to FSL through HC Dharmender. The opinion regarding the nature of injury was also obtained on MLC of injured Shyam Sundar. During investigation on 24.02.2018, Shyam Sundar handed over to him X-ray plate which was being carried by him and same was taken into possession vide memo Ex. PW-15/C. The photographs which were SC No. 398-2018 State Vs. Suraj Kashyap FIR No. 66-2018 Page no.15/35 taken by the crime team were also collected by him. The photographs of the CCTV footage were also got developed. The photographs are exhibited as Ex. PW- 15/D(colly) (total 4 photographs). The statement of witnesses were recorded and chargesheet was prepared under the supervision of SHO. By that time, FSL result could not be collected as the same was not prepared. Later on, the FSL results were collected and same were filed before the Hon'ble Court vide his requests in this regard Ex. PW-15/E and Ex. PW-15/F respectively.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Suraj Fir No. 344/2017 on 13 November, 2019

State vs. Suraj FIR No. 344/2017 He during his cross-examination by the learned defence counsel stated that he saw the accused from a distance of 100 meters. He stated that he did not know the accused prior to this case. He denied the suggestion that no recovery was effected from the accused or that he has been falsely implicated in this case or that no public witness was joined in the investigation as he was not present at the spot or that entire proceedings were conducted in the police station.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Surajpal on 19 August, 2025

22. It is evident from the record that no public witnesses to the recovery of the liquor have been either cited in the list of prosecution witnesses or has been examined by the prosecution. Apparently, IO had even asked a few public persons to join the investigation, however, all of them refused to join the investigation. Admittedly, no notice was served to such public persons upon their refusal to join investigation in the case. Thus, it is not the case of State Vs. Suraj Pal FIR No: 137/2022 U/s : 33 Delhi Excise Act P.S.Vikas Puri 9 prosecution that public witnesses were not available at the spot. However, from a perusal of the record, no serious effort for joining public witnesses appears to have been made by the investigating officer.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Suraj on 1 June, 2024

In the present case there are no cogent material available on record to suggest that accused had caused damage to the DTC Bus bearing no State Vs. Suraj FIR No. : 426/2021 PS Hauz Khas U/s 279/427 IPC Page no.8 of 9 DL1PC9623 by driving the cluster bus bearing no DL1PC5371in a rash or negligent manner on the alleged date of incident. There is also no material available on record to show that accused had deliberately caused mischief by damaging the cluster bus.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Suraj on 14 July, 2025

14) Further the case property was sent for chemical examination on 01.11.2019 while the same was seized on 06.10.2019. The entire paper formalities were completed in 06.10.2019 only. When the entire codal formalities were completed on 06.10.2019 than the delay of 25 days in sending the exhibits for chemical examination is beyond comprehension. Again the police official having the possession State Vs. Suraj FIR No. 624/19 U/s. 33/38 Delhi Excise Act 6/8 of the seal was posted in the same police station where the case property was lying. There was ample opportunity for tampering with the case property and benefit of this laxity on the part of investigating officer should go to the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next