Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing The Oriental Insurance Company ... vs Thukarama Adappa S/O Venkappa Adappa ... on 18 November, 2006

Smt. Hanumanthamma W/O Late Ullagaddi ... vs Mabu Vali S/O. Hussain Peera on 11 April, 2018

11. On the other hand, counsel for the claimants placing reliance on paragraph 21 of the judgment in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Thukarama Adappa reported in LAWS(KAR) 2006 11 46 and contends that the insurer is liable to pay compensation for the injuries sustained to the owner of the goods, which was carried in the vehicle.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Divisional Manager, Bajaj Allianz ... vs Smt. Jayamma W/O Late B. Venkateshulu, on 11 April, 2018

11. On the other hand, counsel for the claimants placing reliance on paragraph 21 of the judgment in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Thukarama Adappa reported in LAWS(KAR) 2006 11 46 and contends that the insurer is liable to pay compensation for the injuries sustained to the owner of the goods, which was carried in the vehicle.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

M/S Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Smt. Hanumanthamma W/O Late Ullagaddi ... on 11 April, 2018

11. On the other hand, counsel for the claimants placing reliance on paragraph 21 of the judgment in the case of Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Thukarama Adappa reported in LAWS(KAR) 2006 11 46 and contends that the insurer is liable to pay compensation for the injuries sustained to the owner of the goods, which was carried in the vehicle.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Branch Manager vs Gurunathappa S/O S/O Shantappa Anr on 1 December, 2020

In respect of injured falling under class (1) to (3) the liability of the insurance company is unlimited. In respect of injured falling under class (4) to (6) the liability of the insurance company is restricted to the liability arising under Workmen's Compensation Act. Though in respect of class (1) to (3) referred to above, the premium is to be paid as per the terms of the contract, in respect of class (4) to (6) no premium is liable to be paid. The premium paid while taking the policy covering the risk of class (1) to (3) would be sufficient to cover the risk of class (4) to (6). In other words the liability to pay compensation in respect of class (1) to (3) arises out of contract and the liability to 24 pay compensation in respect of class (4) to (6) arises statutorily once the aforesaid contract is entered into. Therefore, it follows all persons who fall outside these classes/categories are not covered under the policy.
Karnataka High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - H Sanjeevkumar - Full Document

National Insurance Company Limited vs Ugilla Ramulu And 2 Others on 8 July, 2024

10. The learned Commissioner by placing reliance upon the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in National Insurance Co. v. Prembai Patel and others 1 ; New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Satpal Singh 2 , and of the High Court of Karnataka in Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Thukaram Adappa and Others3 held that the opposite party No.1 could not escape its liability and bound to indemnify the opposite party No.2 in payment of compensation to the applicants and that they were jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation to the applicants.
Telangana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - G R Rani - Full Document
1   2 3 Next