Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.47 seconds)

Dr. Kumar Chandan vs Indira Gandhi Institute Of Medical ... on 9 February, 2024

In any case, we find that the direction [Aditya Narayan Roy v. Union of India, 2018 SCC OnLine Pat 6164] Patna High Court L.P.A No.318 of 2021 dt. 09-02-2024 28/51 issued by the High Court directing the State Screening Committee to recommend Respondent 1's name to UPSC was completely without jurisdiction. Upon reaching a finding of arbitrariness in the selection process, the Court could at the most have issued a direction to the State Screening Committee to reassess the names of all candidates by giving due consideration to all relevant documents. As already observed above, it was not for the Court to sit in judgment over the merit of the candidates and substitute its reasoning for that of the Screening Committee. Be that as it may, in light of the above discussion, we conclude that there is no case to direct the reconsideration of the seventeen candidates before the Screening Committee, or to interfere with the appointments already made for the selection year 2014."
Patna High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indra Gandhi Institute Of Medical ... vs Dr. Nishant Kashyap on 9 February, 2024

In any case, we find that the direction [Aditya Narayan Roy v. Union of India, 2018 SCC OnLine Pat 6164] Patna High Court L.P.A No.318 of 2021 dt. 09-02-2024 28/51 issued by the High Court directing the State Screening Committee to recommend Respondent 1's name to UPSC was completely without jurisdiction. Upon reaching a finding of arbitrariness in the selection process, the Court could at the most have issued a direction to the State Screening Committee to reassess the names of all candidates by giving due consideration to all relevant documents. As already observed above, it was not for the Court to sit in judgment over the merit of the candidates and substitute its reasoning for that of the Screening Committee. Be that as it may, in light of the above discussion, we conclude that there is no case to direct the reconsideration of the seventeen candidates before the Screening Committee, or to interfere with the appointments already made for the selection year 2014."
Patna High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1