Sukhdev Rai Kaushal vs Gokal Chand Mittal on 26 August, 2013
Learned counsel for the petitioner has further argued that in
the instant case, objection petition of the petitioner has been rejected
summarily without framing issues and without affording any opportunity
to the parties to lead evidence in support of their respective pleas; and
therefore, the impugned order deserves to be set aside on this ground
also. To support his case, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed
reliance upon a judgment of this Court rendered in 'M/s Woolways,
Shop-cum-Office, Chandigarh and others v. Central Bank of India,
Chandigarh and others' AIR 1990 Punjab and Haryana 92; 'Hem Raj
Bansal v. State Bank of India' 1989 PLJ 703 and 'Santokh Singh v.
Amar Kaur and others' 2006(3) RCR (Civil) 67.