Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing State Of U.P. And Another vs Narendra Nath Dixit And Others on 19 January, 1993

B. Venkata Prashant vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. on 16 February, 1998

120. Coming to the other contention that no minimum marks were prescribed for the students appearing for the common entrance test, the Supreme Court upheld the admissions through 'Common entrance test in State of A.P. v. I. Narendm Nath (supra). In case of admissions through common entrance test though one has to pass the minimum qualifying examination, the admissions shall be in order of merit on the basis of ranking assigned to the student in the common entrance lest conducted for that purpose. Even in the scheme framed by the Supreme Court, students to be ad mined strictly on the basis of ranking obtained by them in the common entrance examination in the general seats to the extent of 50% in the Private Engineering Colleges and they are liable to pay the tution fee on par with students admitted in Government Colleges. The admissions to the remaining 50% of payment seats shall be made strictly on the basis of merit from among those students who are willing to pay higher tution fee over and above the one paid by the student admitted under the general category. Likewise, the minority institutions are given liberty to fill up 50% of the total in-take in a given year from among the minority students. Once again these admissions are directed to be strictly on the basis of inter se merit among the minority students.
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 69 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Narendra Kumar & Another vs State Of U.P. & Another on 16 June, 2010

Heard learned counsel the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent The present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 16.2.2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No.1 District Ghaziabad issuing non-bailabal warrant against the applicants in S.T. No. 394 of 2009 (State Vs. Narendra and others) under sections 307 I.P.C. P.S. Sahibabad District Ghaziabad .
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pankaj Dixit And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 17 July, 2019

Present application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the entire proceedings of S.T. No.1774 of 2011 (State Vs. Pankaj Dixit and others) arising out of Case Crime No.68 of 2006, under Sections 147, 308, 323, 504, 506, IPC, P.S. Naubasata, District Kanpur Nagar, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge, IInd, Kanpur Nagar.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Joshi - Full Document

Narendra Pal Singh & Others vs State Of U.P. on 6 July, 2010

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the maximum sentence of two years has been awarded by the trial court. The appellants are on the interim bail, the appellants were on bail during pendency of the trial, they have not misused the liberty of bail. Let the appellants Narendra Pal Singh, Anupam Sharma, Naushe, Mustquim and Rakesh Sharma convicted in S.T. No. 499 of 2005- State vs. Narendra and others under sections 395, 397, 307, 435, 335, 332, 353, 427 I.P.C. and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station Dilalri, District Moradabad be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. The realization of fine shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Allahabad High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document
1